About EurexOTC Clear
EMIR 3.0 - active account
CCP Switch
On-boarding
Compression Service
Product Scope
Interest Rate Swaps
Inflation Swaps
Settlement Prices
Service Offering for PSAs
Clearing Member
ISA Direct Member
ISA Direct Light Licence Holder
Clearing Agent
Client
Jurisdictions
Multiple Clearing Relationships
Segregation Set up
Cross-Project-Calendar
Readiness for projects
C7 Releases
C7 SCS Releases
C7 CAS Releases
EurexOTC Clear Releases
Prisma Releases
Member Section Releases
Simulation calendar
Archive
User ID Maintenance
Clearing Hours
Clearing Reports
Product Specifications
Clearing on behalf
Delivery Management
Transaction Management
Collateral Management
Collateral
Transparency Enabler Files
Segregation Models
Reports
Default Fund
Intraday Margin Calls
OTC Clear Procedures
OTC Clear Tutorials
Cross Margining Support
Supplementary Margins
Default Waterfall
Model Validation
Stress testing
Default Management Process
Client Asset Protection under EMIR
Client Asset Protection under LSOC
Credit, concentration & wrong way risk
System-based risk controls
Pioneering CCP Transparency
Haircut and adjusted exchange rates
Securities margin groups and classes
Prices Rolling Spot Future
File services
Bond Clusters
Listed derivatives
OTC derivatives
Listed securities
Cash management
Delivery management
CCP eligible instruments
Eurex Newsletter Subscription
Circulars & Newsflashes Subscription
Corporate Action Information Subscription
Circulars & Readiness Newsflashes
News
Videos
Webcasts on demand
Publications
Forms
Events
FAQs
Production Newsboard
Historically, banks preferred to use internal models to calculate regulatory capital requirements, allowing for a closer alignment between risk management and capital allocation. As regulators grew increasingly skeptical of the utility of internal models, backstops such as the Standardized Approaches for Risk Weighted Assets (RWAs) and the Leverage Ratio (LR) were put in place. The Standardized Approach to Counterparty Credit Risk (SA-CCR) is applied in these backstop measures for derivative exposures. SA-CCR has now been implemented across most jurisdictions. The methodology has improved risk sensitivity compared to previous supervisory methods, meaning that there will be winners and losers. SA-CCR delivers benefits for banks with balanced portfolios with individual counterparties, while those with directional counterparty portfolios are heavily penalized.
SA-CCR is only directly applicable to banks and other institutions supervised under prudential regulation. The buy side is impacted indirectly, as the banks who provide the liquidity to the buy side have to manage their derivative portfolios under the new regime. This can lead to higher costs for the buy side, including transaction costs/pricing (i.e., bid/offer) and/or higher funding and liquidity costs through (voluntary or mandatory) collateralization requirements.
Central clearing offers several advantages for banks, including:
In addition to the above, Eurex offers some exchange-traded derivative (ETD) alternatives to OTC derivatives. There are lower margin requirements for ETD, compared to their OTC derivative equivalents, due to lower margin period of risk (i.e., liquidation period) assumptions.
Using ETD and cleared OTC derivative alternatives could be part of an effective bank capital management strategy addressing SA-CCR and UMR with follow-on benefits for the buy side.
Calculating SA-CCR
Contacts
Fixed Income, Funding & Financing | FX | Equity & Index |